The Things They Carried Ben Cornelius The narrative “The Things They Carried” by Tim O’Brien is an tremendously elaborate fictional history of a wartime scenario in which jemmy Cross ( the story’s chief character ) grows as a individual. and the emotional and physical luggage of wartime are brought to visible radiation. The most obvious and outstanding characteristic of O’Brien’s authorship is a repeat of item. O’brien besides passively analyzes the effects of wartime on the developing mind by giving the reader close up penetration into common trials of war. but non in a needfully expositorial sense. .
He takes us into the heads of mere childs as they cope with the incredible and under-talked-about effects or apologizing decease. uncomfortableness and solitariness every bit good as the subjects of gallantry. physical and mental hurting. and a loss of artlessness. Obrien achieves this through extended description. imagination and tone coupled with an confidant relationship with the narratives chief characters. O’brien repeatedly states what each soldier is transporting for two grounds. The first ground is character development.
The more the reader knows about a character’s possessions the more he/she efficaciously knows about the characters themselves. An illustration of this would be how Cross carries a image of a miss. fantasying whether or non she is a virgin. Dobbins carries excess rations and his girlfriend’s pantyhose around his cervix. This implies superstitious notion and an above norm weight. Ted Lavender carries weed and tranquillizers to pacify his anxiousness. This suggests an inability to get by with decease or force ; possibly wartime as a whole.
Finally Kiowa carries an illustrated transcript of the new testament and a knife given to him by his male parent. These ownerships allude to the fact that he is a adult male of God with a regard for his male parent. I think it id dry. though. that all of these men’s non-military points are of no existent effect in the war. They don’t do anything. It could be argued that these points are a manner of escape for the military work forces. that it helps them get by mentally. I. nevertheless. would reason to the contrary. I think that all of these hometown relics merely truly provide torment.
They serve merely as a touchable reminder of what they are losing and who will lose them if they fall to the Earth in the war. Character growing is besides indispensable to the narrative. In the beginning Cross fantasized about a miss named Martha. He fantasizes conditions or non she is a virgin and later. fantasy about different ways to take her virginity. This fantasy consumes him until the twenty-four hours his best friend and ground forces compatriot. Lavender. dies. Cross believes Lavenders decease to be his mistake and decides to set his phantasies to rest and presume. to the full. a place of true leading.
This alteration in character is besides marked by Cross’ devastation of the image. The devastation of phantasy is besides important in that it shows Cross’ passage from boyhood into adult male goon. The primary difference between childhood and maturity is the load of duties. At a certain point every immature grownup must subject to these or be a failure. This entry is a melancholic clip as it marks the terminal of unchecked optimism and the beginning of pragmatism. For Cross. this alteration is particularly melancholic because the accelerator for his alteration was the decease of a loved one.
Cross loss of artlessness here is. nevertheless. non remarkable in the sense of the narrative. Cross’ loss of artlessness is symbolic the loss of artlessness that all of his soldiers must confront. But even more so. it is symbolic of the lost artlessness of whole coevalss and their states. In any wartime scenario the young person of feuding states must set aside artlessness and take on the morbid duty of decease and war. They must get down to understand the complex nature of highly volatile geopolitical relationships and set their ain nature aside to presume the individuality of a state.
An individuality which is per se corrupted. As a reader I was really much disturbed at Cross’ loss of artlessness. After Lavender dies. Cross crouches in his fox hole in the rain and burns the two images of Mary that he has every bit good as the letters. I think that the symbolism of rain here is truly poten. T but besides carries contradictory messages to the reader. Rain in general. is a symbol of purification. but I think in this context it is besides symbolic of utmost unhappiness and depression. I like the fact that. through personification. the rain could stand for artlessness seeking to continue itself.
This means that he rain itself doesn’t want cross to fire the images. Besides. in the aforesaid contradictory sense. the rain besides represents the utmost unhappiness that is accompanied by crosses loss. It is besides of import to observe that this loss of artlessness is supplemented by an image of decease. When Cross burns the images and letters it could be viewed as cremation. I felt the same sense of loss while reading this as the bereaved would experience. This portion of the narrative represents a really actual decease of artlessness. In the same paragraph Cross explains that he now Hates Mary.
Because in Cross’ head Mary is responsible for his ain distraction and therefore the decease of Lavender. He says that he still loves her. but in a hating sort of manner. This shows that when Cross lost his artlessness. he besides lost his ability to harbour pure love. Now all his hereafter love will be tinged with the unhappiness and hurting of his first love. His purest love. The tone of “The Things They Carries” is really much dark and premonition. To back up the tone of the narrative Obrien uses dark colour strategies and dark emotional strategies every bit good as the conditions and scene.
O’brien writes “kiowa shook his caput unhappily and glanced over at the hole where Lieutenant Jimmy Cross sat watching the dark. The air was thick and wet. A warm dense fog had settled over the Paddies and there was the hush that precedes rain. ” Here. O’brien uses the conditions to demo the melancholy of the state of affairs. The reader is enveloped by a sense of loss and fear. The hush that precedes rain suggests that the soldiers have non yet accepted Lavenders decease. They are in denial. They are still guiltless in their denial. Merely upon credence will they be able to lose their artlessness and go existent soldiers.
The thick air is declarative of emotional and physical subjugation. Physically the soldiers have to cover with unwellness heat and uncomfortableness. But mentally they have to cover with the fact that. if they are to accept their emotions it would be overpowering. therefor non an option. They would squinch into the dense. oppressive sunshine. “For a few minutes. possibly. they would fall soundless. illuming a joint and tracking its transition from adult male to adult male. inhaling. keeping in the humiliation. ” O’Brien writes of the emotional subjugation as a means to avoid humiliation.