Israeli-Palestinian problems Essay

The Israeli-Palestinian jobs arise out of an on-going struggle between Israel and Palestine and contributes to the Arab-Israeli struggles. ( David. 1996. 363 ) Historians by and large take the place that deciding the ongoing jobs between the two states is the key to eliminating at least in portion. the menace of Islamic terrorist act around the universe. ( Schoenbaum. 2006. 281 ) There have been many efforts by the United Nations and universe powers. peculiarly the US to decide the tensenesss between Israel and Palestine. but to no help.

( Slater. 2001. 171 ) The most that can be gleaned from these peace-making attempts is the designation of the barriers to constructing peace between Israel and Palestine. This research paper will critically measure the jobs between Israel and Palestine. the barriers to peace edifice and the possible solutions for taking these barriers and constructing peace between the two states. This paper will besides analyze the effects for universe peace should the struggles and tensenesss between Palestine and Israel continue to brew. Overview

Historically. the Israeli-Palestinian struggle is characterized by six distinguishable periods of tensenesss. The first period and the beginnings of the struggle can be traced back to the late nineteenth century with the rise of Zionism and Arab Nationalism. ( Gelvin. 2005. 93 ) The Zionist motion was a Judaic national motion formed in 1897. chiefly in response to sentiments of antisemitism throughout much of Europe and Russia. The Arab patriotism motion was in bend a reaction to Zionism. ( Gelvin. 2005. 93 ) Zionism advocated for the formation of a Judaic nation-state in Palestine.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

( Rolef and Sela. 2002. 928-932 ) Fostering the cause of the Zionist motion. the World Zionist Organization together with the Judaic National Fund purchased land in the Palestine country under both the British and the Ottoman regulation and advocated for in-migration to the country. ( Tessler. 1994. 53 ) During the rise of the Zionist motion during the late nineteenth century much of Palestine had been occupied by Arab Muslims and Bedouin with a comparatively little figure of Christians. Druze. Circassians and Jews. ( Medding and Harman. 2008. 3-7 ) Palestinian Arab swayers began to see these Zionist aspirations as a menace.

( Fortna. 2004. 97 ) The Arab agitation with the Judaic in-migration to Palestine was more about their national individuality since they originated from Europe and Russia. The prevalent feeling among the Arabs in Palestine was that the migration of Europeans and Russians to the country disturbed Palestine’s national individuality. ( Kramer and Harman. 2008. 121 ) A figure of Arab protests arose as a consequence of Zionist purchases of belongings in Palestine. The consequence of these land purchases and in-migration policies was a important addition in the Judaic population in the country.

By 1917. the British defeated the Ottoman Turkish military and later occupied Palestine where they remained until the First World War ended. ( Kramer and Harman. 2008. 121 ) The 2nd period of struggle followed the terminal of the First World War with the British business of Palestine. The League of Nations transferred the Palestine job to the British. backing the Balfour Declaration and naming upon the British to make the Judaic Agency. designed to form and pull off Judaic affairs in Palestine.

( Yapp. 1987. 290 ) The Balfour Declaration was formulated by the British authorities in 1917 and stated as follows: “His Majesty’s authorities position with favour the constitution in Palestine of a national place for the Judaic people. and will utilize their best enterprises to ease the accomplishment of this object. it being clearly understood that nil shall be done which may prejudice the civil and spiritual rights of bing non-Jewish communities in Palestine. or the rights and political position enjoyed by Jews in any other state. ” ( Yapp. 1987. 290 )

The Palestinian Arab population grew progressively hostile toward British pro-Zionist policies. Making affairs worse. Judaic in-migration continued to turn. with important Numberss of Jew migrating to Palestine as a consequence of increasing antisemitism in Europe. In the Ukraine. 10. 000 Jews had been killed. ( Berry and Philo. 2006. 4 ) The Nazi’s rise to power in Germany merely served to increase Judaic in-migration to Palestine. A figure of public violences erupted in Palestine. spearheaded by the Arab population in protest against the turning Judaic population.

( Nicosia. 2008. 130 ) The British effort at deciding these struggles was the Haycraft Commission of Inquiry. 1921. the Shaw Report 1930 and the Peel Commission of 1936-1937 which was followed by the White Paper of 1939. ( United Nations. 1947 ) These studies reflect the character of the attempts for declaration of the Israeli-Palestinian struggle. The Peel Commission recommended a divider of the country and the White Paper suggested a individual province declaration with quotas for the both Jewish and Arab immigrants to Palestine.

( United Nations. 1947 ) The cut off period for these in-migration limitations extended over the Second World War at a clip when the Holocaust displaced a figure of Jews in Europe. This resulted in a figure of illegal in-migration by Jews to the part and this merely served to increase tensenesss. ( Nicosia. 2008. 130 ) After the Second World War. the Judaic Resistance Movement was established and in protest against British policies in Palestine. engaged in a figure of onslaughts against the British military. One such onslaught saw the bombardment of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. the central office for the British military personnels.

( Tessler. 1994. 256 ) Be that as it may. intelligence of the Holocaust brought with it international understanding for the Zionist motion. ( Tesler. 1994. 210 ) Coinciding with these developments. the United Nations encouraged the division of Palestine into three subdivisions under a Compulsory Palestine policy. ( Tessler. 1994. 185 ) These divisions included an Arab State. a Judaic State and an International Zone which would include Jerusalem and the country around it. In the interim. Bethlehem and Jerusalem would be controlled by the United Nations. Tessler. 1994. 185-268 )

The Unitied Nations’ solution was unpalatable to both the Jews and Aabs in Palestine. ( Laquer and Rubin. 2001. 69-80 ) Despite these early marks of the futility of a divided province in Palestine. the UN indorsed the program on Novermber 29. 1947. The day of the month for divider was earmarked at May 15. 1948. the day of the month by which the British were scheduled to retreat its military personnels from the part. ( Laquer and Rubin. 2001. 69-80 ) With a strategic program for division in topographic point. force between the Jews and the Arabs. typically instigated by the Arabs. picked up impulse with unfastened warfare over paths in Palestine taking centre phase.

( Greenville. 2005. Chapter 39 ) Zionist leader. David Ben-Gurion. declared the execution of the State of Israel on May 14. 1948. following a decisive triumph in contending against the Arabs and became Israel’s first Prime Minister. ( Hazony. 2001. 267 ) The declaration of the State of Israel received broad blessing with both the US and the USSR back uping the new State at the United Nations. Hazony ( 2001 ) uncertainties nevertheless. if this declaration would hold garnered such broad spread support if emotions hadn’t been “stirred by the Holocaut.

” ( twenty ) In the old ages that followed. the convulsion and menace to universe peace that followed. via medias whatever satisfaction the Zionists and their protagonists derived from the creative activity of the Judaic province. ( Hazony. 2001. twenty ) The effects for universe peace began about instantly following the declaration of the State of Israel. puting forth the 3rd period of Israeli-Palestinian jobs. An Arab-Israeli War erupted on May 15-16. 1948 when ground forcess from Jordan. Syria. Egypt and Iraq and subsequently Lebanon. invaded Israel.

( Nazzal. 1978. 18 ) The new State of Israel emerged winning and later annexed district that would infringe upon the partitioning boundary lines of the Judaic State and making over into the Arab boundary lines in Palestine. Jordan occupied the West Bank ad East Jerusalem. Israel occupied West Jerusalem and Egypt. the Gaza Strip. ( Sela. 2002. 491-498 ) In 1950 nevertheless. would take ownership of the West Bank. ( Sela. 2002. 491-498 ) The Israeli-Arab War of 1948 would merely function to perplex affairs for universe peace and peculiarly Jews.

Approximately 856. 000 Jews either fled voluntarily or were forced to flea from Arab states. many go forthing their belongings and personal ownerships behind. ( Shulewits. 2001. 139-155 ) Likewise. Palestinian Arabs suffered a immensely similar destiny in country so organizing the new Israeli province. going known as Palestinian refugees. These refugees were at the same time denied re-entry into Israel and entry or citizenship in the recessing Arab States. salvage and except for the Transjordan West Bank. the Egyptian occupied Gaza Strip. the East Bank of Jordan Riverm Syria and Lebanon.

( Brynen and El-Rifai. 2007. 1 ) In 1949. Israel proposed repatriating 100. 000 refugees and to re-open antecedently frozen bank histories. ( Sela. 2002. 58-121 ) Arab leaders. nevertheless. fortified in their place against the acknowledgment of an Israeli province chiefly refused to accept the Israeli olive subdivision. ( Sela. 2002. 58-121 ) The consequence is. the Palestinian refugees continued to stay a beginning of struggle and tenseness between Israel and Palestine as many of these safeties remain in refugee cantonments.

( Brynen and El-Rifai. 2007. 132 ) Conflicts between Arabs and Jews accelerated along the boundary line of Israel and Jordan. get downing with minor Israeli foraies and Palestinian responses which merely escalated in clip and strength. After the Israel onslaught on an Egyptian military base in the Gaza strip in February 1955. the Egyptian functionaries began to prosecute in patronizing. build uping and developing Palestinian Fedayeen from along the Gaza Strip who would carry on foraies on Israel. ( Shlaim. 2000. 128 ) Harmonizing to Avi Shlaim ( 2000 ) it was non until the Israeli foray on the Gaza strip that Egypt took such a hawkish attack to Israel.

( 129 ) Previously: “… the Egyptian military governments had a consistent and steadfast policy of controling infiltration by Palestinians from the Gaza Strip into Israel. ” ( Shlaim. 2000. 129 ) Be that as it may. several old ages subsequently. in 1964. the Palestinian Fedayeen resulted in the formaiton of the Palestine Liberation Organization ( PLO ) . The PLO had as its end the release of Palestine via the protections of armed combat whose responsibility it was to “puge the Zionest presence from Palestine. ” ( Rubinstein. 1982. 209 )

In 1967 Egypt conducted a figure of scare tactics by mobolising military personnels in the Sinai Peninsula which was followed by several other immensely similar moves by Arab states neighboring Israel. As a preemptive work stoppage. Israel attacked Egypt and the Six-Day War followed. At the terminal of this latest raid. Egypt annexed the Gaza Strip and the West Bank which besides included East Jerusalem. This would merely increase belligerencies between Israel and the Arabs. ( Oded. 2002. 127 ) The 4th period of Israeli-Palestinian tensenesss commenced following the Six-Day War.

In February 1969 Yasser Arafat was selected to chair the PLO and about instantly. the PLO set about perpetrating armed onslaughts on Israel in an effort to prehend control of the West Bank. However. Israel got the better of these armed struggles and PLO forces were exiled to Jordan where the Palestinian population was overpowering and onslaughts on Israel continued by virtuousness of terrorist onslaughts. The inevitable followed with Israeli reacting with counter onslaughts. ( Shlaim. 2000. twenty-three )

The tensenesss increased and by 1970. the PLO seized control of southern Lebanon and conducted projectile onslaughts against the Galilee towns and other panic onslaughts on the north boundary line of Lebanon and Israel. Palestinian terrorist groups spearheaded by the PLO together with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine commenced an intense run against the Israelis abroad. peculiarly in Europe. ( Streissguth. 1993. 43-58 ) In an attempt to strengthen the run. Palestinian guerillas waged several onslaughts on Israeli civilians at schools. on coachs and in flat composites.

Attacks overseas targeted embassies. airdromes and the highjacking of aircraft. At the 1972 Munich Summer Olympics. Israeli jocks were taken surety by the Black September “faction of the PLO” . ( Judaken. 2006. 201 ) The Israeli governments responded by virtuousness of a foray on the PLO central office in Lebanon. Other ill-famed panic onslaughts would follow including the Savoy Hotel onslaught. the Zion Square icebox detonation and the Ma’alot slaughter in 1974 which claimed the lives of 22 kids. ( Streissguth. 1993. 43-58 ) In 1974. the Yom Kippur War commenced under the abetment of Egypt and Syria which was a surprise onslaught on Israel.

A cease fire ended the war and gave manner to the oncoming of the Camp David Accords. 1978 puting guidelines for peace dialogues in the hereafter. Still the panic onslaughts continued. ( Jureidini and McLaurin 1981. 1-26 ) Israel launched the Operation Litani which was designed to recover control of Southern Lebanon to the boundary line with the Litani River. ( Ron. 2003. 175 ) The operation was successful and the PLO took up abode in Beirut. Even after Israel’s backdown. Palestinian terrorist and guerillas continued to fire projectiles at Galilee. Israel.

Finally. in 1981. US president Regan negotiated a cease fire that endured for a twelvemonth. ( Ron. 2003. 175 ) An blackwash effort on Shlomo Argov. Israeli’s Ambassador to the UK ended the cease fire on June 3. 1982. ( Bar-On. 2004. 200 ) This gave manner to the 1982 Lebanon war in which Israel invaded Lebanon on June 6. 1982 claiming the move necessary for the protection of northern Israel. ( Bar-On. 2004. 200-201 ) In order to convey an terminal to this latest military struggle in the part. US and European diplomats negotiated for the safe conveyance of cardinal PLO leaders such as Arafat to Tunis. an exile finish.

( Bregman. 2002. 145 ) By June 1985. the Israelis withdrew in big portion from Lebanon. go forthing behind a minimum cabal in South Lebanon in an country designated a security zone. In Tunis. the PLO lead runs against Israel with a figure of terrorist onslaughts which resulted in the Israelis bombing the PLO’s cantonment in Tunis during the behavior of Operation Wooden Leg. ( Bregman. 2002. 152 ) Continuous rebellions in the West Bank and the Gaza Strips continued and by January 1988. directed by the PLO in Tunis these rebellions became more organized. characterized as Intifadas.

The first Intifada resulted in the decease of 1. 551 Palestinians and 422 Israelis. ( Israeli-Palestinina Deaths. 1987-2007 ) During the Gulf War of 1990-1991. Arafat appeared to back up Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait following which the PLO was financially cut off by many Arab provinces. ( Aburish. 1998. 201-228 ) The US and the USSR seized the chance following the Gulf War to get down a peace conference between the Palestinian Arabs from states such as Syria. Lebanon and Syria and Israel. It began with the Madrid Conference in October 1991. commandeered by Russia and the US.

( Bush. 1991 2-23 ) Even so. the terminal of the Gulf War saw more international attempts with regard to deciding the issues in the Israeli-Palestinian tensenesss. This would tag the 5th phase of this on-going sage and commenced from 1993-2000. In January 1993 at that place appeared to be some advancement toward peace when Arafat sent an official missive to Israel’s so prime curate Yitzhak Rabin. claiming to abdicate terrorist act and to acknowledge Israel as an independent province. ( Exchange of Letters between Rabin and Arafat. Sept. 9. 1993 )

What followed was the Olso Accords in which the parties tried to put up a two-state solution. The understanding called for a Palestinian Authority. headed by Arafat which would pattern and promote Israeli tolerance. ( BBC News. November 2003 ) However. there is grounds that the Palestinian Authority non merely supported but besides funded terrorist work stoppages and organisations. ( BBC News. November 2003 ) . The force in the Palestinian countries continued and in February 1994 the Kach motion killed 29 Palestinian Arabs in the Cave of the Patriarchs slaughter.

( Scharfstein and Gelabert. 1997. 306 ) The Palestinian Hamas retaliated by carry oning suicide bomb onslaughts against Israeli civilians throughout Israel. Scharfstein and Gelabert. 1997. 306 ) In September 1995 Arafat and Rabin signed an Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement with regard to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The understanding called for Palestinian Arabs to return to occupied countries of Palestine and for Palestinian acknowledgment and credence of Israel’s right to a peaceable being.

The understanding nevertheless was non accepted by Hamas and other PLO affiliates who were go oning to perpetrate panic onslaughts in Israel. ( Rheinhart. 2005 ) These explosions of force would qualify the 6th phase of peace dialogues during the Camp David Accords 2000 with the consequence that nil has been resolved between the Palestines and the Israelis today. ( Rheinhart. 2005 ) The troubles with deciding the issues that give rise to the jobs between the Jews and the Arabs originate out of the fact that they are being mediated from a strictly subjective and wholly selfish position.

Having examined the nature of the struggle and the failed efforts at peace. the balance of the paper will measure why these jobs persist despite efforts to eliminate them. The Peace Process As antecedently. noted. the attack taken to the support of the constitution of the Judaic State is chiefly dictated by emotions in the wake of the Holocaust. However. there were other affairs that influenced the attack. The United States on the other manus. had and really likely still has its ain docket.

Willaim Viorst maintains that the US’ function with regard to the peace edifice procedure in the Middle East was influenced by a two-tier docket built around the undermentioned political orientation: “…pressing for grants from all sides to set up some lasting negotiated colony. and guaranting Israel came out of the understanding strong plenty to move as the U. S. placeholder in the country against Soviet menaces. ” ( Viorst. 1987 ) In add-on. the US’s attitude toward a figure of Middle Eastern states. such as Syria. who is really much involved in the Israeli-Palestinian struggles. is characterised by misgiving.

Sepearte and apart from disapproving of states such as Syria’s bossy governence. the US has ever taken a base against that nation’s nexus to terrorists and its anti-Israel place. ( Zunes. 1993. 62 ) This stance against terrorist act is peculiarly strong following the September 11 onslaughts on the US. In the concluding analysis. the lone thing that was accomplished in the yearss following the Six-Day War and the nowadays was a twine of discredited grants on the parts of both Palestinian and Israeli functionaries. One illustration is found in the on-going battles with Syria.

( Zunes. 1993. 62 ) Syria agreed to demilitarise the Golan Heights country. permit international supervising together with other security comittments in return for Israel’s backdown neither side have been able to populate up to their side of the deal. ( Zunes. 1993. 62 ) Viorst raises yet another point. The Ma’a batch Massacre which merely threatened the peace edifice procedure and provided Isreal with evidences for doing renewed demands of neighboring Arab states to shut its boundary lines to terrorist. ( Viorst. 1987 ) Syria’s Hafez Assad. exemplifies the grade of Arabic pride that was virtually ignored in these peace-builing procedures.

This pride commands trueness to Arabic civilization to such an extent that it compromises the ability to objectively hold to such a demand for fright of the perceptual experience that the leader is regarded as holding been weakened to the will of the Israelis. ( Viorst. 1987 ) A deadlock was hence inevitable. US Secretary of State. Henry Kissinger responded by directing a missive to the Israeli authorities backing whatever agencies of damages it desired in reponse to the terrorist onslaughts on its terrirory. Viorst points out that Kissenger efficaciously pledged that:

“…no hereafter president would keep back American economic or military aid as penalty for antiterrorist reprisals. It committed Washington to back up such onslaughts before the universe. most notably at the United Nations. In consequence. it imposed a serious new restriction on America’s ability to oblige restraint within the rhythm of force that so frequently ran amok in the Arab-Israeli battle. ” ( Viorst. 1987 ) When this missive is read together with mention to the fact that the Americans provided military assistance to Israel during the Yom Kippor War. it is barely surprisig that peace edifice between Israel and Palestine failed clip and clip once more.

Particularly compromising was the fact that the US in its function as go-between. President Nixon was caught up in the thick of the Watergate dirt by1974. ( Viorst. 1987 ) It would look. that Nixon’s focal point on the Palestine-Israel struggle was rather perchance more of an effort to deflect attending off from the Watergate dirt and was determined to convert the populace that he was an “indispensable to peacekeeping” in this hostile part. ( Viorst. 1987 ) Nixon’s foremost circuit of the Middle East did non turn out every bit good as planned.

Newly elected Israeli Prme Minister Yitzhak Rabin made it clear that he wanted Israel to stay the US fastness in the Middle East but at the same clip he was non interested in the current peace-keeping dialogues. ( Viorst. 1987 ) Russia’s function in the peacebuilding procedure in the earlier old ages besides gave off the feeling that. like the US. the Soviets were captive on keeping a fastness in the Middle East. by supplying support for the Palestines.

To this terminal. the Palestinian-Israeli struggle came to be a provy war. between the world’s ace powers. in their several battles for universe laterality and power. Stephen Zunes provides a rational footing for puting the incrimination for the uninterrupted failure of the peace constructing procedure between Palestine and Isreal on the US. To get down with. it likely goes without stating that Israel’s neighbors. peculiarly Palestinian Arabs. hold both political and economic motivations for desiring peace with Isreal.

The decomposition of the Soviet Union gave manner to “dramatic political and economic shits” in the Middle East as a whole. ( Zunes. 2000. 1-4 ) Furthermore. US laterality in the part in the wake of the Gulf War. together with “the constitution of the Palestinian Authority” the fortunes are such that those caught in the center of the Palestinian-Syrian struggle on the Arab side. “ can no longer harvest politial capital from arousing struggle with Israel. ” ( Zunes. 2000. 1-4 )

On the other side of the spectrum. Israel is non motivated nor is it inclined “to take the necessary steps” to ease a feasible colony and likewise. the United States “appears unwilling to force its ally to compromise. ” ( Zunes. 2000. 1-4 ) Despite the on-going peace negotiations concluding Israel-Palestinina peace agreement may non be possible any clip shortly. ( Zunes. 2000. 1-4 ) It becomes progressively clearer with clip that while the United Sates is keeping itself out as an impartial go-between. when one looks beneath the surface the United States is slanted in its support of Israel and its attack to the Israeli-Palestinian jobs.

Zunes explains how this is so by directing attending to the US attack to the annexed land following the UN Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338 in regard of wars between Arab States and Israel. Resolution 242 called for peace in the Middle East by necessitating Israel to retreat from the districts it annexed following the 1967 War and for the “Termination of all claims or provinces of belligerency” . ( UN Security Council Resolutions 242 ) Resolution 338 followed the Yom Kippur War and fundamentally called for a cease fire.

( UN Security Council Resolutions 338 ) When Syria rejected the declaration the United States claimed that Syria was “hard-lined” for its rejection of these Resolutions. When Syria “dramatically moderated its policies” and accepted the declarations the United States complained that Syria was “hard-lined for their insisting on the resolutions’ rigorous execution. ” ( Zunes. 2000. 1-14 ) The obvious effect is “an deadlock that can be broken merely by a displacement in U. S. policy. ” ( Zunes. 2000. 1-14 ) The Madrid Conference was co-sponsored by the United States and the Soviet Union.

The conference involved peace negotiations themed after UN Resolution 242. “land for peace talks” between Israel and the Arab States caught up in the Palestinian-Israeli struggle. ( Rabinovich 1999. 39-43 ) These peace negotiations represented a tie in to extra peace negotiations at assorted other forums up to the twelvemonth 2000. Yet no agreement was struck. Conclusion Clearly. the sollution to the Israeli-Palestinian jobs involves a quid pro quo attack. The Middle Eastern states straight surrounding Palestine want their land returned to them and Israel wants security against terrorist onslaughts.

In order to decide these issues in a mode that is just to both sides. the US. as primary go-between should suggest that Israel withdraw from the parts in exchange for clearly defined security gaurantees from its neighboring Arab states. The US can accomplish this end by endangering to retreat its current economic and military support to Israel. The implicit in hindrance to the long history of dialogues between Israel and Palestinian neighbor has been the instability of force per unit area.

While the environing Arab states. peculiarly Syria. have been pressured by a deficiency of military and economic assistance to do grants Israel has had no inducements or force per unit area to at least run into its hostile neighbors midway. The United States function appears to be artful since it has repeatedly failed to set force per unit area on Israel to be just and nonsubjective. Works Cited Aburish. S. ( 1998 ) From Defender to Dictator. New York: Boomsbury Publishing. Bar-On. M. ( 2004 ) A Ceaseless Conflict: A Guide to Israeli Military History. Greenwood Publishig Group. BBC News. ( November 7. 2003 ) “Palestinian Authority Funds Go to Militants.

” hypertext transfer protocol: //news. bbc. co. uk/2/hi/middle_east/3243071. short-term memory Retrieved 2 May. 2009. Berry. M. and Philo. G. ( 2006 ) Israel and Palestine: Conflicting Histories. Pluto Press. Bregman. A. ( 2002 ) Israel’s Wars: A History Since 1947. Routledge. Bryen. R. and El-Rfai. R. ( 2007 ) Palestinian Refugees: Challenges of Rapatriation and Development. I. B. Tauris. Bush. P. ( 1991 ) “The Madrid Middle East Peace Conference October 30-November 1. 1991. ” Foreign Policy Bulletin 2. 2-23. David. Newman. ( 1996 ) “Shared Spaces – Separate Spaces: The Israel-Palestine Peace Process. ” GeoJournal 39 ( 4 ) 363-375.

Exchange of Letters between Rabin and Arafat. ( Sept. 9. 1993 ) hypertext transfer protocol: //www. mideastweb. org/olsoletters. htm Retrieved May 3. 2009. Fortna. V. ( 2004 ) Peace Time: Cease-Fire Agreements and the Durability of Peace. Princeton University Press. Gelvin. J. ( 2005 ) The Israel-Palestine Conflict: One Hundred Old ages of War. Cambridge University Press. Greenville. J. ( 2005 ) A History of the World From the 20th to the twenty-first Century. Routledge. Hazony. Y. ( 2001 ) The Judaic State: The Struggle for Israel’s Soul. Basic Books. Israeli-Palestinian Deaths. 1987-2007. ( n. d. ) hypertext transfer protocol: //israelipalestinian. procon.

org/viewersousce. asp? resourceID=639 Retrieved 2 May 2009. Judaken. J. ( 2006 ) Jean-Paul Sartre and the Judaic Question: AntipAmtisemitism and the Politicss of the Gallic Intellectual. University of Nebraska. Jureidini. P. and McLaurin. R. ( 1981 ) Beyond Camp David: Emerging Alliances and Leaderships in the Middle East. Syracuse University Press. Kramer. G. and Harman. G. ( 2008 ) A History of Palestine: From the Ottoman Conquest to the Founding of the State of Israel. Princeton University Press. Laquer. W. and Rubin. B. ( 2001 ) The Israel-Arab Reader: A Documentatry History of the Middle East Conflict.

Penguin. Medding. P. and Harman. M. ( 2008 ) Sephardic Jewry and Mizrahi Jews. Oxford University Press. Nazzal. N. ( 1978 ) The Palestinian Exodus From Gallilee. 1948 Institute for Palestine Studies. Nicosia. F. ( 2008 ) Zionism and Anti-semitism in Nazi Germany. Cambridge University Press. Oded. E. ( 2002 ) “Arab-Isreal Peacemaking” cited in Sela. A. ( erectile dysfunction ) The Continuum Political Encyclopedia of the Middle East. New York: Continuum. Reinhart. Tanya. ( 2005 ) Israel/Palestine: How to End the War of 1948. New York: Seven Stories Press Roelf. H. and Sela. A. ( 2002 ) “Zionism. ” Cited in Sela. A. ( erectile dysfunction )

The Continuum Political Encyclopedia of the Middle East. New York: Continuum. Ron. J. ( 2003 ) Frontiers and Ghettos: State Violence in Serbia and Israel. University of California Press. Rubinstein. W. ( 1982 ) The Left. The Right and The Jews. Croom Helm. Scharfstein. S. and Gelabert. D. ( 1997 ) History of Judaic History: From the Patriarchs to the twenty-first Century. KTAV Publishing House Inc. Schoenbaum. T. ( 2006 ) International Relations: The Path Not Taken: Using International Law to Promote World Peace and Security. Cambridge University Press. Shlam. A. ( 2000 ) The Iron Wall: Israel and the Arabl World. W. W. Norton and Company.

Shulewitz. M. ( 2001 ) The Forgotten Millions: the Modern Jewish Exodus from Arab Lands. Continuum. Slater. J. ( 2001 ) “What Went Wrong? The Collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process. ” Political Science. 116 ( 2 ) . 171-199. Streissguth. T. ( 1993 ) International Terrorists. The Oliver Press. Inc. Tessler. M. ( 1994 ) A History of the Arab-Israeli Conflict. Capital of indiana: Indicana University Press. United Nations. ( October 2. 1947 ) “Ad Hoc Committee on the Palestinian Question: Communication From the United Kingdom Delegation to the United Nations. ” A/AC. 14/8. UN Security Council Resolutions 242 UN Security Council Resolution 338

Viorst. William. ( June 1987 ) “The Kissinger compact and other grounds Israel is in problem – Henry Kissinger. extract from Sands of Sorrow: Israel’s Journey From Independence. ” Washington Monthly. Available on-line at” hypertext transfer protocol: //www. findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_v19/ai_5010446/pg_5 Retrieved 3 May. 2009 Yapp. M. ( 1987 ) The Making of the Modern Near East 1792-1923. Longman. Zunes. Stephen. ( 1993 ) “Israeli-Syrian Peace: The Long Road Ahead. ” Middle East Policy. Vol. 2. p. 62 Zunes. Stephen. ( February 2000 ) ”The US and the Israeli-Syrian Peace Process. ” Foreign Policy in Focus. Vol. 5 No. 3 pp 1-4

x

Hi!
I'm James!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out