Let me get down by specifying Utilitarianism: utilitarianism is the belief of making what is right for the greater figure of people. It is a theory used to find the utility of the happiest result and how it will impact everyone else. Now. this sounds like a astonishing theory. what would be better than doing yourself and others happy? I found myself at first holding with this theory up until I truly looked into it. At first I found myself believing that non everything is about being happy ; some may hold to endure for the felicity of others.
For illustration. there were two boats one contains three felons on decease row being transported to prison and the other boat contains ten happy. loving households merely basking a holiday. Both ships have bombs that will travel off in a affair of seconds. blowing up both ships and killing everyone. However. there is a solution. I for some uneven ground have a device that sets off a bomb on ONE SHIP and deactivates the other. Now the morally right thing to make would be what? What is moral and right? Taking lives? Or salvaging them? I do non believe in ‘playing God’ or taking lives.
I would merely disregard the Utilitarianism manner of thought and walk off. I would allow nature take its class. If God has arranged this to go on. so it is meant to go on. Who am I to walk in and ‘play God’ ? I have to state I agree with Hospers when he says “A hundred work forces might derive great pleasance from crushing up or killing merely one Insignificant human being ; but other men’s lives are non theirs to dispose of. ” ( Hospers ) A Utilitarian would near this state of affairs by inquiring himself/herself. what will convey felicity? What will make good for greater Numberss of people?
Why should the captives get to populate? There are merely three captives. and have done nil good but cause injury to society. What have these households done? The Utilitarian will get down to analyse each item of the state of affairs. They foremost see that there are merely three captives as opposed to ten big households. Hence. there are less people on the captives boat. Then he/she will see that the captives have already been sentenced to decease. all being on decease row. However. the chief point will be that these are three bad work forces. Making bad things. and doing hurting and sorrow
to others. Why should ten happy households be punished for their incorrect behaviors? The Utilitarian would settle for merely deactivating the bomb on the captives boat. Believing that killing them will convey greater good and felicity to all. My statement to this is a human life is a human life ; what if one of those work forces are really guiltless and were convicted for a offense he didn’t commit? What if the other felon was to be released in the forenoon and travel place to a household of eight kids and a loving married woman? Truth is we don’t know.
Utilitarianism fails to admit that a life is a life- we are non suppose to be playing God. We don’t make up one’s mind who lives and who dies. even if it is for the greater good. We should merely allow nature run its class. Utilitarianism is a theory of ever taking pleasance over hurting for the greater good of all. I believe that I have kept a closed head towards Utilitarianism. The captives are already on decease row. which means they are traveling to decease for the immorality they have set free on our universe. Why should I give the lives of guiltless households. for a twosome of work forces that have caused unhappiness to all?
I want to make felicity. as does everyone else in the universe. I mean does the universe map over what the greater good for all is? Is that why we have soldiers in Iraq giving their lives for the greater good of America? Possibly I have merely overlooked all the positive results of Utilitarianism. I find myself holding with a batch of what it has to state. I want felicity. I want guiltless lives to be saved. and I want to endeavor for the greater good of all. I find it interesting how easy it is to fall into the comfort of Utilitarianism.
It goes along with my ethical motives and values and yet I still experience a kind of guilt. If I were to deactivate the bomb on the ship with the households and allow the captives die. I would still be taking a human life. In my faith ( Catholicism ) . a life is a life. We must forgive evildoers and those who have sinned against us. But if these captives are on decease row…were they already destined to decease? Would that already be in God’s program? Was it God who sacrificed his lone boy for all of us evildoers? I feel in a manner that makes God himself a follower of utilitarianism.
He set the illustration of offering his lone boy for our wickednesss. to open the Gatess of Eden for everyone. Yet one of the Ten Commandments is “Thou shall non kill. ” Is that non hypocritical? As I keep analysing this state of affairs I realize that God is God. He decides who lives and who dies. non us. I feel that it’s difficult to lodge to my ethical motives when hearing the theory of Utilitarianism. Leting person to decease at my manus for the greater good. for felicity of others. That merely sounds selfish to me. sort of like the holocaust. Did all those guiltless Jews endure experimentation and anguish for the greater good of all?
I mean. if it weren’t for these monstrous experiments we wouldn’t cognize the maximal height that crews in damaged planes can jump safely to the land or happen the cure/treatment for hypothermia. The Jews were used as guinea hogs for the greater good of everyone else. Is that non Utilitarianism? So many people could hold died of hypothermia if that experiment was ne’er conducted. But how many guiltless lives were lost to make this decision? Is at that place a bound to how much forfeit should be made for the greater good? There should be.
This is where I can non link with Utilitarianism. the fact that some kind of immorality has to be done to assist others. I see hypocrisy in this theory ; it wants happiness but wants to govern out evil. Peoples are evil. mean and rude. No 1 can be happy all the clip ; no 1 can convey ageless felicity. This takes me back to my original illustration. who would I salvage? The captives on decease row or the guiltless households? The Utilitarian’s seem to hold a more interesting statement. Its amusing how by composing this paper. my positions changed. I look at the state of affairs otherwise now. I do non experience as colored and conservative as earlier.
My thoughts have changed to a more broad understanding sense. Why release these evil me back into the universe? We have adequate pandemonium and immorality. These are merely three work forces who chose their waies and now have to pay for it. They were sentenced to decease for a ground. I will non be held responsible for the artlessness of happy households. kids. parents. aunts and uncles. They are non in prison because they have non done anything incorrect. They merely stepped onto a ship. whose destiny I now hold in my custodies. I have made my pick ; I will deactivate the bomb on the households boat and allow the captives face decease.