Final Paper The impact of ballistic technology has taken crime solving to a whole new level. With a single scan of a bullet into a ballistics database, the original gun fired can be Identified within minutes. Once the gun is identified, however, this can give law enforcement officers the lead they will need In order to identify the suspect and further the investigation of the case. Ballistic Fingerprinting is a method that Is used to Identify a bullets origin of fire, In other words, what gun fired the bullet In question. “The technology behind the achievement Is called IBIS, short for Integrated Ballistics Identification System.
Like many Ideas In law enforcement, Including fingerprinting Itself, IBIS Immigrated to the united States. Created by Forensic Technology Inc. Of Montreal In 1991, It was Initially adopted by the TAFT and police departments outside of the United States” (Wilson, 2001, Para 6). Since this technology has been adopted In the U. S. , more and more cases each year are being solved rather than going cold. This technology Is very crucial to not only solving ongoing criminal cases, but cold cases as well. The turnaround of these cases is phenomenal. The only real problem with this new technology is those who try to diminish its DOD qualities.
The NEAR for example is completely against this technology. If a law was passed stating that every gun manufactured had to be put into a database with a test fire sample as well, the NEAR would fight and petition for this law not to pass. “As it happens, this is precisely what ballistic fingerprinting is designed to accomplish. A registry entails no paperwork for gun owners or restrictions on gun purchases, just better detective work. Does this mean their lobby is onboard? Please. The NEAR is working overtime to shoot holes in the new technology’ (Pull the Trigger on Fingerprints, 2002, Para 5).
If the NEAR were on board, this technology would flourish. There are some states already requiring gun manufacturers to fingerprint the shell casings on new firearms made. New York and Maryland are a couple of examples. In the state of California, the Department of Justice works hard on testing their fingerprinting database to ensure its accuracy. “Researchers… Fires shells from a particular weapon and asked the system to match the casing’s fingerprints against a data base containing fingerprints from 792 cartridge casings fired by other weapons, Including the one being tested” (Which Weapon Did It? ).
The only problem that keeps the accuracy levels low is if the casings are made by different manufacturers. Regardless of the brand of bullet, to be able to scan a shell Into the database and find Its gun match Is still top notch technology that Is desperately needed In law enforcement. To keep this technology around and growing, results of cold cases and current cases being solved must grow substantially. Law enforcement continues dally to update their data bases to ensure progress Is kept In a forward motion. So, until congress can be convinced that the technology is worthy of such a law to register all