Air New Zealand Flight 901 Essay

A McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30 aircraft ( Registration Mark 2K-NZP ) . owned and operated by Air New Zealand. Ltd. . as non-scheduled air transport flight TE-901 from Auckland. New Zealand to Christchurch. New Zealand. over Antarctica. collided with Mount Erebus. Antarctica. on November 28. 1979. killing all 257 individuals on board. The accident has caused widespread attending in that. up to this twenty-four hours. contentions and arguments remain over the true cause of the accident. and in the sum of duty and answerability the air hose and its crew should presume. Public sentiment besides remains polarized.

The accident study compiled by Ron Chippindale. the main inspector of air accidents. attributed incrimination to the determination of Captain Jim Collins to fall below the customary minimal height degree. and go on at that tallness when the crew was unsure of the plane’s place. The aircraft height was 445 metres ( 1465ft ) . manner below the customary lower limit prohibited descent below 1830 metres even under good conditions conditions. The flight program led Collins to believe that the plane was over level land. and old Flight 901 pilots on a regular basis flew low over the country to give riders a better position.

The New Zealand Government besides conducted a one-person Royal Commission of Inquiry into the accident. On April 27. 1981. Justice Peter Mahon cleared the crew of incrimination for the catastrophe. Harmonizing to Justice Mahon. the cause of the clang was the interaction a series of entries of coordinates into the plane’s pilotage computing machine. including an erroneous entry from old ages before. its rectification on the forenoon of the clang and entries of the flight program. The consequence was that the pilots thought they were winging over low level land when they were in fact winging straight into the mountain ; there was a whiteout at the clip.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

No one’s action was the cause if the clang ; it was the cumulative consequence of the series of actions. Justice Mahon besides found that the wireless communications centre at McMurdo Station had authorized Collins to fall to 450 metres. Controversially. Justice Mahon accused Air New Zealand executives of cover-up. disposal of grounds and blind. famously utilizing the phrase “orchestrated litany of lies” . However. the Privy Council accordingly found that Justice Mahon. as Royal Commissioner. had acted in surplus of his legal power and reverse to natural justness sing those allegations.

In their judgement. delivered on 20 October 1983. the five Law Lords of the Privy Council dismissed the Commissioners entreaty and upheld the determination of the Court of Appeal determination. which set aside the costs order against the Airline. on the evidences that Mahon had committed clear breaches of natural justness. On the footing that the demands for the offense of reprehensively negligent violent death could be made out. were the needed actions and mental province to hold been those of a human being. the accident can non be blamed to the pilots and crew of Flight 901.

Harmonizing to the Section 23 of the Criminal Code: “Subject to the express commissariats of this Code associating to negligent Acts of the Apostless and skips. a individual is non reprehensively responsible for an act or skip which occurs independently of the exercising of his will. or for an event which occurs by accident. It can be recalled that the clang was caused by interaction a series of entries of coordinates into the plane’s pilotage computing machine without the knowing of the pilots. Clearly. the pilots and the crew were non accountable for the catastrophe.

However. Air New Zealand is still reprehensively and morally responsible for the loss of lives of the Flight 901 riders. At the clip of the clang. the Civil Aviation ( Carriers’ Liability ) Act 1959 was available to enforce liability on corporations. The Act was enacted to implement the Warsaw Convention in Australian jurisprudence. Basically. the Warsaw Convention imposes rigorous liability on international air bearers in regard of decease or personal hurt to riders. devastation or loss of or damage to registered luggage or lading. Liability under the Warsaw Convention for personal hurt or decease scopes to from 125. 000 to 250. 000 francs.

If the Warsaw Convention can non be applied. liability may still be imposed under Australian jurisprudence. Part IV of the Carriers’ Liability Act 1959 applies to air passenger car between Australian States ; to from or in an Australian District ; or between Australia and another state. For such air passenger car. liability for decease or personal hurt is presently capped at $ 500. 000. Furthermore. the ruinous clang of Air New Zealand flight 901 into Mt. Erebus provides an interesting instance in analyzing the thought of corporate moral duty.

A rule of answerability that has Aristotelean roots and is significantly different from the usual rigorous knowing action rules maintains that a individual can be held morally accountable for old non-intentional behaviour that has harmful effects if the individual does non take disciplinary steps to set his ways of behaviour so as non to bring forth repeats. In the instance of Flight 901. the pilots and the crew were non morally accountable since they were non informed about the series of corrections that caused the clang. They could hold taken disciplinary steps had they known these alterations.


I'm James!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out